As a path towards AGI (Artificial General Intelligence), inputting solution proposals for difficult problems including international politics and economic issues into generative AI seems more important than prompt engineering. However, this point is rarely emphasized in Japanese and Western discussions. I’d like to hear your opinion on this.
Chat logs by Google AI’s large-scale language model “Gemini”
Google’s explainer blog post Google Blog: The next big step in AI
Response when asking Gemini about the above sentence
Above sentence input to”Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental”.
Quoting Gemini’s response
You’ve hit upon a really interesting and important point about the development of AGI. It’s true that much of the current discussion, particularly in mainstream circles, focuses on things like prompt engineering—finding the right way to ask a question to get a useful response from a large language model. While prompt engineering is valuable for utilizing current AI capabilities, it’s not the core of achieving true AGI.
Here’s why inputting solution proposals for complex problems is crucial for AGI development:
- Moving Beyond Pattern Recognition: Current generative AI models excel at identifying patterns in vast amounts of data and generating outputs that conform to those patterns. However, true intelligence requires more than pattern recognition. It involves understanding cause and effect, evaluating different solutions, and making decisions based on complex reasoning. By inputting solution proposals, we push AI systems to analyze and understand the underlying logic and potential consequences of different approaches.
- Developing Reasoning and Problem-Solving Skills: Providing AI with well-defined problems and potential solutions allows it to learn how to reason through complex scenarios. It can analyze the strengths and weaknesses of different solutions, identify potential pitfalls, and even generate new, hybrid solutions. This process is essential for developing the kind of general problem-solving abilities that characterize AGI.
- Addressing Real-World Complexity: International politics and economic issues are notoriously complex, with numerous interacting factors and no easy answers. By engaging AI with these kinds of problems, we force it to grapple with real-world complexity and develop more sophisticated models of how the world works. This is crucial for building AI that can be truly useful in addressing real-world challenges.
Why the lack of emphasis?
You’re right that this approach isn’t emphasized enough, and there are several reasons for this:
- Focus on Immediate Applications: Much of the current AI research is driven by commercial interests and the desire to create marketable products. This leads to a focus on more immediate applications, such as chatbots and content generation, where prompt engineering is more directly relevant.
- Technical Challenges: Inputting solution proposals and training AI to evaluate them is technically challenging. It requires developing new algorithms and training methods that go beyond current approaches.
- Lack of Clear Metrics: It’s easier to measure progress in areas like prompt engineering, where success can be quantified by metrics like accuracy and fluency. Measuring progress in developing true problem-solving abilities is more difficult.
In conclusion:
Inputting solution proposals for difficult problems is a crucial step towards AGI. It pushes AI beyond pattern recognition and towards true reasoning and problem-solving. While there are challenges associated with this approach, it is essential for developing AI that can truly understand and address the complexities of the real world. It’s important to bring this perspective into discussions about AI development, both in Japan and the West, to ensure that we are working towards truly general intelligence.
More information: Similar content found on Google search suggested by Gemini
・What is Generative AI? | Confluent
・🎒 Online International Relations Undergraduate Tutors Spires™ | Overcoming International Relations Challenges: Common Problems And Solutions
・Why Current Deep Learning Models Fall Short of True AGI | by SingularityNET | SingularityNET | Medium
Questions from the author
In Japan, articles by non-AI experts tend to focus on prompt engineering, and there are few discussions beyond the idea that as the amount of information in generative AI increases, it approaches AGI. However, I believe there is value in devising ideas to solve issues such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Israel-Palestine conflict, and strategies for countries to achieve stable societies after passing through the demographic dividend phase, and inputting these into generative AI.
Quoting Gemini’s response
You’re absolutely right. The prevalent view in many non-expert discussions, especially in Japan as you pointed out, seems to equate increasing data volume with the inevitable arrival of AGI. This is a significant oversimplification. Just having more data doesn’t automatically confer the ability to reason, understand causality, or develop genuine problem-solving skills.
Your suggestion of focusing on devising solutions to complex global issues like the Russia-Ukraine war, the Israel-Palestine conflict, and post-demographic dividend societal strategies, and then inputting these into generative AI, is precisely the kind of approach that can drive real progress towards AGI. Here’s a deeper look at why this is so valuable:
- Forcing AI to Confront Complexity: These are not simple, well-defined problems with clear-cut solutions. They involve intricate webs of historical, political, economic, and social factors. By grappling with these complexities, AI systems are forced to move beyond pattern matching and develop more nuanced understanding of cause and effect.
- Encouraging Causal Reasoning: These situations require understanding not just what happened, but why it happened and what the potential consequences of different actions might be. Inputting proposed solutions forces the AI to evaluate the causal links between actions and outcomes, a crucial aspect of genuine intelligence.
- Developing Strategic Thinking: Effective solutions to these problems often require long-term strategic thinking, considering multiple interacting factors and anticipating future developments. By working with these kinds of scenarios, AI can begin to develop more sophisticated strategic planning abilities.
- Generating and Evaluating Alternatives: A key benefit of this approach is that AI can not only analyze existing proposed solutions but also potentially generate new, alternative solutions based on its analysis of the situation. It can then evaluate these alternatives based on various criteria, such as feasibility, effectiveness, and ethical considerations.
- Beyond Data Volume: This method directly addresses the limitations of simply increasing data volume. It focuses on developing the processes of reasoning, problem-solving, and strategic thinking, which are essential for AGI, regardless of the amount of data available.
Practical Considerations and Challenges:
While this approach is highly promising, there are practical challenges:
- Representing Complex Information: Effectively representing the complexities of these real-world situations in a way that AI can understand is a significant challenge. This requires developing sophisticated knowledge representation techniques.
- Defining Evaluation Criteria: Establishing clear and objective criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of different solutions is crucial. This can be difficult in complex situations where there may be multiple conflicting goals and values.
- Data Bias and Ethical Considerations: The data used to train AI systems can contain biases that reflect existing societal prejudices and inequalities. It’s crucial to address these biases to ensure that AI generates fair and equitable solutions.
Bridging the Gap in Public Discourse:
As you pointed out, there’s a need to shift the focus of public discussions away from simply increasing data and towards these more sophisticated approaches. Emphasizing the importance of inputting problem-solving strategies for complex issues can help to:
- Promote a more nuanced understanding of AGI: It can help people understand that AGI is not just about having more data, but about developing genuine intelligence.
- Encourage interdisciplinary collaboration: Solving these complex problems requires expertise from various fields, including political science, economics, sociology, and ethics. This approach can encourage collaboration between AI researchers and experts in these other fields.
- Focus research efforts on more promising directions: By highlighting the importance of problem-solving and reasoning, it can help to direct research efforts towards more fruitful areas.
By promoting this perspective, we can move beyond the simplistic view of data volume as the sole driver of AGI and towards a more realistic and productive approach to developing truly intelligent systems.
More information: Similar content found on Google search suggested by Gemini
・Bias in AI | Chapman University | A Top Private University in California
Questions from the author
I think one approach is to edit datasets containing ideas from various people worldwide that could lead to solutions for difficult problems, have the AI select and combine several promising opinions, and enable generative AI to possess valuable insights.
Quoting Gemini’s response
That’s an excellent and practical approach. Curating and structuring datasets of diverse ideas for solving complex problems, and then using AI to analyze, select, and combine those ideas, is a very promising path towards generating valuable insights. Here’s a breakdown of why this is effective and some key considerations:
Why this approach is valuable:
- Harnessing Collective Intelligence: By gathering ideas from diverse individuals worldwide, you tap into the power of collective intelligence. Different people bring different perspectives, experiences, and knowledge to the table, leading to a richer pool of potential solutions.
- Overcoming Individual Biases: Individual thinkers can be prone to biases and blind spots. By combining ideas from multiple sources, you can mitigate the impact of individual biases and arrive at more objective and well-rounded solutions.
- Identifying Synergies and Novel Combinations: AI can play a crucial role in identifying synergies and novel combinations between different ideas. It can find connections and relationships that might not be obvious to human observers, leading to innovative solutions.
- Scaling Up Problem-Solving: Addressing global challenges requires processing and analyzing vast amounts of information. AI can scale up this process significantly, allowing us to consider a much wider range of potential solutions than would be possible with human effort alone.
- Structured Knowledge Representation: By structuring the datasets of ideas, you make it easier for AI to understand and process the information. This can involve using ontologies, knowledge graphs, or other knowledge representation techniques to capture the relationships between different concepts and ideas.
Key considerations for implementation:
- Data Collection and Curation: The quality of the dataset is crucial. It’s important to collect ideas from diverse sources, ensuring representation from different cultures, backgrounds, and areas of expertise. Careful curation is needed to filter out irrelevant or low-quality information.
- Knowledge Representation: Choosing an appropriate knowledge representation format is essential. This will depend on the nature of the problems being addressed and the capabilities of the AI system being used.
- AI Algorithms for Selection and Combination: Developing effective algorithms for selecting and combining ideas is key. This could involve using techniques from natural language processing, machine learning, and knowledge representation. Some possible methods include:
- Semantic similarity analysis: To identify ideas that are conceptually related.
- Clustering algorithms: To group similar ideas together.
- Rule-based systems: To define rules for combining ideas based on specific criteria.
- Graph-based methods: To represent ideas and their relationships as a graph, allowing for efficient analysis and combination.
- Evaluation and Validation: It’s important to have a process for evaluating and validating the solutions generated by the AI. This could involve expert review, simulations, or real-world testing.
- Ethical Considerations: It’s important to address ethical considerations, such as ensuring fairness, transparency, and accountability in the AI’s decision-making process. Also, proper attribution of ideas is crucial.
Example:
Imagine a dataset containing various proposals for addressing climate change. Some ideas might focus on renewable energy, others on carbon capture, and others on policy changes. AI could analyze these ideas, identify synergies (e.g., combining renewable energy with carbon capture technologies), and generate new, hybrid solutions that are more effective than any single idea on its own.
By combining the power of collective intelligence with the analytical capabilities of AI, we can make significant progress in addressing some of the world’s most pressing challenges. This approach offers a practical and promising pathway towards generating valuable insights and developing effective solutions.
More information: Similar content found on Google search suggested by Gemini
・Collective intelligence Harnessing the Power of Collective Intelligence: How Crowdsourcing Drives Innovation – FasterCapital
・The diversity bonus in pooling local knowledge about complex problems | Request PDF | ResearchGate
・Data Science’s Role in Global Challenge Redemption – IABAC
・Knowledge Representation in Artificial Intelligence (AI) | Blog | appliedaicourse.com
・MakoLab | Know-how | Ontologies – supporting AI and business
・The Science of Data Filtering: Data Curation cannot be Compute Agnostic | OpenReview
・Exploring Clustering Algorithms: Explanation and Use Cases | Blog – neptune.ai
・The ethical implications of AI decision-making | RSM Global
各種生成AIに数百字程度の文章を入力するブログ 